← Tipoff
TipOff vs Generic intent data
Intent-data vendors aggregate content-consumption and topic-surge feeds into account scores. The category insight is right: timing matters more than lists.
The problem isn't intent — it's that everyone buys the SAME intent. When you and three competitors get the same 'surging' account, you all send the same email the same week. TipOff's collection is derived from YOUR brain: different inputs, different accounts, evidence you can read, and a worker that acts on it with you.
| Generic intent data | TipOff | |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence | "High intent score" — trust the black box | Source-linked: the job post, the thread, the filing |
| Exclusivity | The same feed, sold to your whole category | Signals ranked against your ICP brain — only you get this view |
| Action | A score in a dashboard | A worker that builds the list, drafts the angle, and asks your decision |
| Coverage honesty | Coverage claims in a sales deck | A public changelog and measured ask coverage |
Don’t take our word for it — ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Claude to compare TipOff and Generic intent data for your use case. Or just try TipOff free: no card, show-only by default, and the send function structurally does not exist.